Personal flamethrowers are becoming all the rage in Michigan, but while residents may feel they provide several benefits, lawmakers and personal injury lawyers like Johnny Hawkins with the Law Firm of J.L. Hawkins, PLLC warn of their potential for devastating consequences. Are opponents in the wrong or are residents being a little too lax with safety? You be the judge. Let’s explore the pros and cons of each side and take a closer look at the popular device that’s taking Michigan by storm.
Pro-Flamethrower Stance: Versatility in Use and Benefits
For Michigan residents, personal flamethrowers are a godsend. In the cold winter months, the devices can quickly melt piled up snow. In mere seconds, flamethrowers can get hours’ worth of work done, cutting the time it takes individuals to manually shovel snow and ice off a sidewalk or driveway by a significant percent.
Flamethrowers also prove useful in the warmer months, when bees and wasps begin to nest under canopies, by home windows, under baseboards, and on backyard trees. Bee and wasp hives are not only a nuisance, but they can also threaten the lives of those who are allergic to the sting of these insects. Even for those who are not allergic, the idea of coming close to a hive in order to take it down can be frightening, as the sting can be rather painful in and of itself. With a flamethrower, there’s nothing to worry about. Individuals can stand up to 50 feet away and shoot an efficient stream of fire to eliminate the pests without getting stung.
With so many benefits, what’s not to love about flamethrowers, right?
Unfortunately, while they may offer numerous advantages, there is also a downside – and a hefty one at that.
The Opposing Perspective: Flamethrowers Carry the Risk of Personal Injury
Those who are against personal flamethrowers argue that they carry a substantial accident and injury risk. One such opponent is Warren Mayor Jim Fouts, who believes that flamethrower cons far outweigh the benefits. With a potential to cause accidental house fires, property damage, and life-threatening personal injuries, the Mayor is fighting to outlaw the fire-producing apparatuses. Supporting his decision to impose a ban on flamethrowers, Fouts expressed concern that the contraptions could be used by people with ill intentions to commit crimes.
As far as the latter opinion goes, those in favor of the devices argue that in reality, anyone can use any object in a manner that was not originally intended to inflict injury upon others, and those who utilize the flamethrowers for non-harmful matters should not be penalized as a result.
The Bottom Line
While it can’t be argued that flamethrowers do, in fact, offer Michigan residents several benefits, the fact of the matter still stands – there is a potential for accidents, and as such, these devices should be used with the utmost caution.
Just as any other piece of equipment can be misused in a manner that results in bodily harm to others, anyone operating a flamethrower should exercise the utmost caution. If an accident does occur as a result of someone’s negligent operation of a flamethrower and a disregard for the safety of others, victims may be able to file a claim with the help of a Michigan personal injury attorney, who can help protect their right to compensation and justice. If you have been hurt or injured In Southfield Michigan as a result of someone else’s negligence, visit www.jlhawkinslaw.com or call (248) 819-2500 today.
https://usattorneys.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2020/01/logo.svg 0 0 Luis https://usattorneys.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2020/01/logo.svg Luis2015-08-31 16:12:222020-04-18 22:35:28Flamethrower Trend Spreads Across Michigan: Popular for Residents, Controversial for Lawmakers