When two or more parties are liable for a collision, Kentucky’s comparative fault standard will apply.

When two or more parties are liable for a collision, Kentucky’s comparative fault standard will apply.


Accident lawyer in Lexington, Kentucky explains how accident victims can recover compensation if they were partly at fault for an accident
Lexington, KY- Motorists make mistakes; it’s just a reality of driving. Sometimes when an accident occurs, each party involved is partly responsible. It isn’t uncommon for accident victims to share fault for a collision making liability an issue when the injured files an injury claim. In this article, USAttorneys will discuss Kentucky’s share fault rules and how they will affect the outcome of your accident claim.
Liability is established early  
The issue of accountability will arise in the initial stages of a car wreck claim, and luckily being partly to blame for a collision won’t prevent you from recovering compensation. Even if you are considered liable, you can recover compensation, but the amount you ultimately obtain could be reduced significantly.
When you begin settlement negotiations, you should expect an insurance adjuster to do whatever they can to limit their liability which means they will try to pin some of the blame on you, so you need a personal injury lawyer on your side to counter those claims.
Liability is an issue that will arise at the beginning stages of your claim.

Liability is an issue that will arise at the beginning stages of your claim.


What is comparative negligence?
When two or more parties are to blame for a collision, Kentucky uses a comparative negligence rule. Under that rule, each of the parties involved in a car or truck wreck are assigned a percentage of the blame depending on the actions they took which led up to the crash.
An accident lawyer can ensure you don’t get less than you deserve for your Lexington accident.

An accident lawyer can ensure you don’t get less than you deserve for your Lexington accident.


For instance, a motorist is making a right turn, but they fail to use their turn signal and are rear-ended. In this scenario, the driver of the car who rear-ended a leading car would take on more responsibility for a collision because they were following too closely. Turn signals are necessary and let other drivers know what a motorist is going to do, but it is far less dangerous than following too closely, so most of the liability would fall onto the rear-ending driver. In this example, the driver who failed to use their blinker could be assigned 15 percent of the responsibility, and the striking driver could be assigned 85 percent of the fault. Instead of the victim recovering 100 percent of the final settlement, an accident victim’s compensation would be reduced by their level of liability, so in this case, the victim would only recover 85 percent of the overall award.
No matter how insignificant you think your role in a car collision is, you need someone to protect your legal interests and help you recover a just settlement. You could get a much smaller settlement you deserve if you don’t have an experienced and devoted accident lawyer.We recommend you contact the Troutman Law Firm which serves accident victims in Lexington, Kentucky and set up a case evaluation.
You are not excluded from recovering compensation for your accident even if you were partly to blame.

  You are not excluded from recovering compensation for your accident even if you were partly to blame.

0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.